Folks, it’s been an insane few weeks.
I know you’ve been missing The Scrambler. We’ve been missing it even more. 
Rest assured, plenty of content lined up. We’ll be back next week. 
Spare a moment for Japan. And stay thirsty my friends.
Also, set your clock ahead on Sunday. Winter is over.

Folks, it’s been an insane few weeks.

I know you’ve been missing The Scrambler. We’ve been missing it even more. 

Rest assured, plenty of content lined up. We’ll be back next week. 

Spare a moment for Japan. And stay thirsty my friends.

Also, set your clock ahead on Sunday. Winter is over.

Bravo.
imgfave:

★ discovered on imgfave.com (social image bookmarking)

Bravo.

imgfave:

discovered on imgfave.com (social image bookmarking)

Medicine has never been better; our overall health, however, is worsening.

— David Gratzer, MD

That, my friends, is the simple truth of modern life in America. Health is less and less about what doctors can do for you, but what you can do for your health. However, The System’s responsibility is to arm you with the easily accessible and affordable tools to help you optimize your health via fresh food, safe activity, and communities that provide real relationships and strong social support from family, friends, and neighbors.

via

(via jayparkinsonmd)

#discuss

Well, here’s your conclusion. A bookend to Valentine’s day, if you will. Get out there and make it happen…..
Ladies- Mr. Right is out there. But you’ll settle for mr right now after a few drinks at the bar.
Gentlemen- In case you still didn’t realize it, today was Valentine’s day. Grab your butterfly nets.

Well, here’s your conclusion. A bookend to Valentine’s day, if you will. Get out there and make it happen…..

Ladies- Mr. Right is out there. But you’ll settle for mr right now after a few drinks at the bar.

Gentlemen- In case you still didn’t realize it, today was Valentine’s day. Grab your butterfly nets.

More good news….

Guess How Ugly the Unemployment Rate Would Be At 2000 Participation Levels
The decrease in the participation rate in the U.S. economy has left our understanding of what the real unemployment rate is a little cloudy. The latest unemployment report showed huge revisions, but little reality, as to where we really stand. Albert Edwards of Societe Generale has put together this chart to provide a little context. It shows what the U.S. unemployment number would look life if we were at the peak participation rate of 67%, which occurred around 2000. At that participation rate, unemployment would be about 4 percentage points higher than the current headline figure of 9%. Edwards says that 4% is the equivalent of 6.7 million more unemployed people. So if the participation rate increased 3% (from its current 64% to 67%), unemployment would actually be 13%. That gap is partially made up of long-term, structurally unemployed construction workers left behind after the housing bust, and is a significant number.

More good news….

Guess How Ugly the Unemployment Rate Would Be At 2000 Participation Levels

The decrease in the participation rate in the U.S. economy has left our understanding of what the real unemployment rate is a little cloudy. The latest unemployment report showed huge revisions, but little reality, as to where we really stand. 

Albert Edwards of Societe Generale has put together this chart to provide a little context. It shows what the U.S. unemployment number would look life if we were at the peak participation rate of 67%, which occurred around 2000. 

At that participation rate, unemployment would be about 4 percentage points higher than the current headline figure of 9%. Edwards says that 4% is the equivalent of 6.7 million more unemployed people. 

So if the participation rate increased 3% (from its current 64% to 67%), unemployment would actually be 13%. That gap is partially made up of long-term, structurally unemployed construction workers left behind after the housing bust, and is a significant number.

infoneer-pulse:

Apple’s iPad Officially Passes the Higher Education Test

Apple’s iPad received glowing marks for its performance in college classrooms from the eagerly anticipated Reed College evaluation, according to a new report shared with Fast Company. The iPad’s smooth interface kept up with the lighting-quick pace of college lectures, helping it to overcome the very same gauntlet that killed the Kindle’s hope of education dominance a year earlier. Most importantly, the report predicts an explosion of opportunity for both Apple software developers and tablet competitors.
After extensive student interviews throughout the Fall 2010 semester, “The bottom line feeling was that the Amazon Kindle DX was not adequate for use in a higher education curricular setting,” Chief Technology Officer Martin Ringle tells Fast Company. “The bottom line for the iPad was exactly the opposite.”

» via Fast Company

infoneer-pulse:

Apple’s iPad Officially Passes the Higher Education Test

Apple’s iPad received glowing marks for its performance in college classrooms from the eagerly anticipated Reed College evaluation, according to a new report shared with Fast Company. The iPad’s smooth interface kept up with the lighting-quick pace of college lectures, helping it to overcome the very same gauntlet that killed the Kindle’s hope of education dominance a year earlier. Most importantly, the report predicts an explosion of opportunity for both Apple software developers and tablet competitors.

After extensive student interviews throughout the Fall 2010 semester, “The bottom line feeling was that the Amazon Kindle DX was not adequate for use in a higher education curricular setting,” Chief Technology Officer Martin Ringle tells Fast Company. “The bottom line for the iPad was exactly the opposite.”

» via Fast Company

The 2012 White House Budget Proposal. Who Will Survive In America?

Sigh. This is truly depressing.

You can get a full look at the White House’s 2012 Budget proposal here. Usually we put it on Scribd, but their site is broken. Besides, it’s a 216 pager. Not exactly light reading.

In lieu of the doc, we’ve given you a handy data viz for the spending allocations. It’s illuminating.

So what’s the big deal? We reprint Jon Cohn in full…..

President Obama on Monday will release his budget request for the 2012 fiscal year. As you read commentary on it—or, if you’re as nerdy as I am, as you read the document itself—keep in mind that this is the first budget request he’ll be producing since the Republicans took over one house of Congress. It’s a huge difference and not merely in the obvious ways.

Obama’s previous budgets were the president’s way of signaling, to members of his own party, what initiatives he intended to pursue and roughly what resources he expected Congress to give him. He could expect some negotiation and pushback, from liberals on some issues and from centrists on others. But mostly he could count upon Congress, which Democrats controlled, to follow him. 

The Republican House, of course, will do no such thing. They have their own, very different priorities and their own, very different ideas about how to pay for them. Accordingly, Obama’s budget is more of an opening bid in a tough, rancorous negotiation. That means you should evaluate the document as a signal of political strategy, not simply a statement of policy priorities. And that makes it tougher to judge.

Between the administration’s recent statements and a series of calculated leaks, we have a pretty good idea of what Obama is trying to do. He’s going to call for spending more money on education and other public investments, but he’ll also endorse enough cuts to keep overall non-defense discretionary spending at last year’s levels. Elementary and secondary school education, for example, should get a boost. But Pell Grants, for low-income college students, are going to take a hit, albeit a carefully crafted one.* There will be more money for building high-speed rail but less for helping low-income families pay their heating bills.

Is this a good thing? In absolute terms, clearly, the answer is no. The demand for Pell Grants is unusually high right now; among other things, cash-strapped states are raising tuitions at state schools just as cash-strapped students and families have fewer resources to pay them. Energy costs for next winter, when the cut in heating assistance would take effect, are likely to be higher than at any time since 2008. Unless the economic recovery quickens very suddenly, plenty of people will struggle to pay those heating bills. And those are just two examples of program reductions that will leave needy Americans even more needy. 

But everything is relative, and that means judging these cuts alongside both the modest increases you’ll find elsewhere in this budget and the much larger increases you saw in previous ones. Robert Greenstein, director of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, will spend the next few days dissecting the Obama spending request and, as he does, he will likely find plenty not to like. But, during an interview, he also put disappointments in context:

I think [Obama’s] record is very strong — major expansions in refundable tax credits for the working poor, major expansion of student financial aid for low-income students so that more of them can go to and complete college, and of course, major health reform that will extend coverage to 32 million uninsured people. This is the most impressive record of any president since LBJ.

Obama’s spending request looks even better when you consider what the Republicans would do if left to their own devices. They haven’t committed themselves to a 2012 budget just yet. But they’ve said they want a far deeper freeze than Obama’s, reducing non-defense discretionary spending to what it was in 2008. On Friday, they offered a preview of that vision when they announced their proposal for how to finance government for the remainder of the current fiscal year.

They want far more severe cuts to Pell Grants and home heating assistance, plus reductions to such essential services as food inspections and the elimination of programs like Americorps. They also want to reduce spending on the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infant, and Children. That initiative, known as WIC, provides nutritional assistance to expectant mothers and newborns. As Paul Krugman notes, that cut will hurt today and tomorrow, since kids who grow up malnourished are more likely to have problems later in life.

The most important question about Obama’s budget, then, is how well it positions him and his allies in the coming debate over these sorts of priorities.  

You could make a case that, by embracing the Republican narrative on the size of government and calling for a five-year budget freeze at present levels, Obama has effectively bid too low in the negotiation over federal spending—that he’s committed himself, and the country, to less government than it needs. (It’s happened before!) Or you could make the case that, by making “tough” proposals to cut programs he supports, he’s establishing the credibility with voters that he needs in order to marginalize the Republicans and to preserve more spending than might otherwise be possible. (It’s happened before!)

I really don’t know which argument is right. I’m not a political strategist and, besides, not even the political strategists can be sure about this sort of thing. But I know I’ll be hoping that Obama prevails in the coming standoff with House Republicans, even though a victory would still leave the government perilously underfunded.

*The details of Obama’s Pell Grant proposal are complicated and worth an item of their own, which I’ll try to write shortly.

So on the one hand, Obama makes a political calculation, cuts spending on things people NEED (like higher ed grants, food inspectors, heating oil for the poor). On the other, the GOP stands for nihilism. 

Who will survive in America? Besides the rich?

#letthemeatcake #whowillsurviveinamerica

newsweek:

sesamestreet:

Everyone loves something.  What do you love?

We love that Sesame Street’s on tumblr.

newsweek:

sesamestreet:

Everyone loves something.  What do you love?

We love that Sesame Street’s on tumblr.